HBase uses two main processes to ensure ongoing operation: 1. In terms of architecture, Cassandra’s is masterless while HBase’s is master-based. Blocks are used for different things in HDFS and HBase. HBase is typically not a good choice for developing always-on online applications and is nearly 2-3 years behind Cassandra in many technical respects. HBase also has a rather complex architecture compared to its competitor. In fact, there are a lot of differences, for example, HBase does not have a query language, but Cassandra does. Cassandra has row-level access, while HBase goes even deeper offering cell-level access. * Workload B: Update. This means its cluster is highly reliable and available. Thanks to this sorting order, Apache Cassandra supports partitioned queries when a user, by specifying a row, can receive a corresponding subset of columns in a given range of column names. See the chart below: HBase vs Cassandra: How does the latter measure up to other systems. Real-time stats/analytics – At times, it is necessary to use the database to track real-time performance metrics for websites. HBase stores file data in tables, which have rows and columns, and resembles standard Excel sheets. Trying to determine which of the two databases is best for you really depends on the project in question. This allows the database to store large data sets, even billions of rows, and provide analysis in a short period. In each row, Cassandra Apache always stores columns sorted by name. Families or named sets, one key can be used to reach different sets. Recommended Articles. However, since Cassandra is always relocating and duplicating the data, it can lead to consistency issues down the road. Benchmarking NoSQL Databases: Cassandra vs. MongoDB vs. HBase vs. Couchbase. Both file storage systems have leading positions in the market of IT products. It would be better to use Cassandra for large amounts of data ingestion because it is a very effective write-oriented database. It is worth noting that HBase separates data logging and hash into two stages, while Cassandra does it … But with large datasets, depending, not as great as HBASE. With our five dedicated labs, Intellectsoft helps businesses accelerate adoption of new technologies and orchestrate ongoing innovation, Leverage our decade-long expertise in IT strategy consulting, product engineering, and mobile development, Intellectsoft brings the latest technologies to your vertical with our industry-specific solutions, Trusted by world's leading brands and Fortune 500 companies, We help enterprises reimagine their business and achieve Digital Transformation more efficiently. However, the default block size is completely different. The map is indexed by a row key, column key, and a timestamp; each value in the map is an uninterpreted array of bytes. Both Cassandra and HBase are database management systems aimed at speeding up the software development process. HBase, it fails miserably. Cassandra CouchDB Clusterpoint DocumentDB DynamoDB HBase MongoDB Redis; Best used: When you write more than you read (logging). HBase is designed to maximize the performance of the HDFS file system, and they fully utilize the block size. Cassandra has a few extra security features: inter-node and client-to-node encryption. However, when we look closer, we see that HBase has a disadvantage in terms of writing speed since it does not write to the log and cache at the same time. Cassandra has use cases of being used as time series. Let’s say we have 64–bit keys. The performance according to database depends on the schemas. However, Cassandra and HBase can provide faster data access with per-column-family compression. Both of the databases when they are on-server write paths nearly in the same way. Conducting a formal proof of concept (POC) in the environment in which the database will run is the best way to evaluate platforms. Cassandra isn’t without its disadvantages. We will assign a token to each server. Only after going through all these processes can the writing process begin. You can use it to build a very dependable data store that is always available. When we delve into security in more detail, we see that both databases offer some granularity when it comes to access control. For example, a partitioned query with the tag0–tag9999 range will result in all columns whose names are between tag0 and tag9999. The biggest difference is the following: if you need web or mobile apps that must always be on and require complex or real-time analytics, then you should go with Cassandra. This could be a significant obstacle when providing custom software development. Columns are combined into column families, and all members of the column family have a common prefix. HBase is a unique database that can work on many physical servers at once, ensuring operation even if not all servers are up and running. Blocks in HBase are for memory storage. HBase still performance issues. There are so many different options now that choosing between all of them can be complicated. GeoSpatial data, Hbase does work to an extent. Tools like Google Analytics are great but not real-time, so it is useful to build a secondary system that provides basic real-time stats. Here, a region is an array of records corresponding to a specific range of consecutive RowKey. Its close integration with Hadoop projects and MapReduce makes it an enticing solution for Hadoop distributions. Cassandra - A partitioned row store. It is necessary to request information about the owner of the data within the table. In layman’s terms, HBase has a single point of failure as opposed to Cassandra. Cassandra, by contrast, offers the availability and performance necessary for developing highly available applications. Home. Master Server is the main server of the Apache HBase. This has been a guide to HBase vs Cassandra. Cassandra and HBase are both complicated; Cassandra is simpler only at first sight. Read performance is mostly about consistency, and … MongoDB - The database for giant ideas It copes well with high loads when working with files and scanning large tables. Recapping everything that was mentioned so far: Cassandra is very self-sufficient while HBase relies on third-party technology in various aspects. Unlike a relational database, there are no restrictions on whether records contain columns with the same names as in other records. The ordered delimiter is important for processing in a way that is similar to Hadoop. MongoDB supports a rich and expressive object model. Since the index system in both HBase and HDFX has many layers it is more effective than the indexes Cassandra has. Some of the schemas work best in MongoDB and some in Cassandra. If you need even more proof that Cassandra expedites the writing process keep in mind that when the cached data is sent to a disk it takes HDFS time to literally store the data. HDFS blocks are disk storage units. Both data models handle time-series data very well which could be very useful for reading the sensors in IoT devices, tracking website data, user behavior and many other uses. The basic idea behind Cassandra’s architecture is the token ring. Also, they are scalable: Cassandra has linear scalability while HBase has linear and modular. For example, there are 4 of them (see the picture below). In our previous article of Apache Cassandra tutorial, we have learned much about Cassandra. You can also index the property of any object at any level of the hierarchy – this is strikingly powerful! The editors of one of the IT portals conducted an experiment that showed how Apache Cassandra compares to Mongodb, a cross-platform document-oriented database program. The master manages the distribution of regions across the Region Server, monitors the regions, manages the running of ongoing tasks and performs a number of other important tasks. The development community constantly updates Cassandra to make it easier, faster, and more time-efficient for software engineers. Thus, it is more suitable for collecting analytics or data from sensors when time consistency is acceptable. Therefore, be sure to pay just as much attention to these laws and regulations as you are paying towards creating your database. Comparing Databases – Cassandra Vs MongoDB Vs HBase: Got a question for us? This is due to the fact that writing to it successfully ends (in the fastest version) immediately after writing to the log (on disk). HBase is a sparse, distributed, persistent multidimensional sorted map. It uses a sole server for the entire writing process, therefore, you can avoid having to compare all of the nodes data versions. Moreover, we will study the NoSQL Database and Relational Database in detail. In each issue we share the best stories from the Data-Driven Investor's expert community. To coordinate actions between services, HBase uses Apache ZooKeeper, a special service for managing configurations and synchronization of services. Afterward, you should try to work on fixing some of the security issues that we talked about especially if you will be handling customer data and many regulations have been put in place in various countries which require you to handle information a certain way. It can store and retrieve data that is modeled in means other than the tabular relations used in relational databases. HA between the two are almost the same. Performance – Read & Write Capability When the comparison is drawn between Apache Cassandra performance and Apache HBase performance, it is done on the front of read and write capability. It can be said that HBase was created to automate Google’s internal processes, but it was also being used to manage file systems around the world. Besides, HBase uses Zookeeper as a server status manager and the ‘guru’ that knows where all metadata is (to avoid immediate cluster failures, when the metadata-containing master goes down). A Kubernetes Tale: Part II — Gotta Kubernetise ’em all. The type of operation of the two platforms on the servers is very similar. For example, it allows for simplifying the implementation of atomic meters, as well as. Current version of Cassandra prepares the separator, but in the past it needed manual rebalancing. Therefore, even though Cassandra can perform many reads per second, the amount of these reads will decline. This aligns well with the key use cases of HBase such as search engines, high-frequency transaction applications, log data analysis and messaging apps. Cassandra Query Language (CQL) closely resembles SQL, and it’s relatively easy for SQL users to learn. Each server will be responsible for one of the token ranges. Here, Cassandra has a more fitting structure, which largely affects the speed of the system. As such, in a Cassandra vs. HBase comparison, Cassandra can offer advanced repair processes for read, write, and entropy. Benchmarking NoSQL Databases: Cassandra vs. MongoDB vs. HBase vs. Couchbase Understanding the performance behavior of a… www.datastax.com Let’s start to play with Cassandra. Conclusions• Bigtable and Dynamo offer two very different approaches for distributed data stores. Apache HBase is able to scale standard Excel tasks towards web development. All calls to the table are made on the primary key. The table rows are sorted by the key of the rows (the primary key of the table), while the sorting is performed in the order of bytes. Still, there are some built-in security measures in both of them such as authentication and authorization. However, we must remember that Cassandra’s reads are targeted and most likely inconsistent. Apache Cassandra is very similar to HBase, but has its own individual advantages and disadvantages. It is designed from the ground up to be consistent. Originally published at skywell.software. Since data for one region can be stored in several HFiles, HBase periodically merges them together to speed up the operation. But first, we need determine what our keys are in general. Big data showdown: Cassandra vs. HBase. Time – the built-in value of HBase, the default is the time to add, but it can be changed, HBase handles 1000 nodes while Cassandra can help with approximately 400 nodes, HBase and Cassandra both support replication between clusters/data centers HBase provides more to the user, so it looks more complicated, but then you also get more flexibility, If strong consistency is what your application needs, then HBase is probably the best fit. HBase handles this automatically if you do not want manual control. However, that basic implementation will not provide the best performance for the user in all use cases and situations. This is why, for example, HBase is used for analyzing a text such as finding a single word in a large document. HBase can use HDFS as a server-based distributed file system. On the surface, it may appear that there is no difference between HBase and Cassandra. ("No one gets fired for choosing Apache's stuff.") You can choose the most suitable platform based on these comparisons: Use our 11+ years of experience in custom software development for your project, Get front-row industry insights with our monthly newsletter, RowKey is the primary identifier of the document (it should be called that way). In turn, the column families contain columns that are combined with a key in the RowKey record. Region Server can support multiple regions. In this article, we will compare Cassandra vs HBase so you can choose the one that is right for you. Thus it’s more suitable for analytics data collection o… In HBase, random read performance was slower. Database Model. Cassandra has excellent single-row read performance as long as eventual consistency semantics are sufficient for the use-case. A Cassandra cluster will be there for you 100% of the time. If you need to scan large amounts of data to produce narrow results, then HBase is better because there is no duplication. If such writes and reads happen a lot the data is cached, but if the table region is moved to another location, then the client would have to start from square one. It allows for reliable and efficient management of large data sets (several petabytes or more) distributed among thousands of servers. The behavior of MongoDB is similar to the previous test where the latency increased together with the throughput. Compare database performance with these comprehensive NoSQL database benchmark reports using stringent database testing tools and see how Scylla outperforms Apache Cassandra, DynamoDB & Bigtable. New Tech Forum. With Cassandra, there are certain roles that each user is assigned which determine which information will be visible to that particular user. With HBase, the latency increases evenly as the workload grows. Still, selecting the the right system for your project is not that easy, as there are always details to consider almost at every turn, especially when it comes to the overall performance of a database management system for your process and project. Cassandra Apache is the only database where writing is faster than reading. In fact, HBase has a block cache that contains all the data that is used most often and as a bonus, it has bloom filters that include the approximate location of other data which will really speed up the process should this data be needed. Lowering the block size in HBase can equalize performance between the two systems where random access is important, whereas increasing the block size for sequential (non-random) read operations also puts HBase and Cassandra very near to each other in terms of performance. It runs on top of the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS). The columns within the record are set in a particular order. Here we have covered HDFS vs HBase head to head comparisons, key differences along with infographics and comparison table. i. Objects can have properties and objects can be nested in one another (for multiple levels). It depend upon how much data you want to put and what is your preference , whether you want more reliability or more consistency in database, and how much node you want to put in your cluster. Each has its advantages and sometimes the choice would merely depend on personal preferences in carrying our software development. Cassandra and HBase Use cases Both data models handle time-series data very well which could be very useful for reading the sensors in IoT devices, tracking website data, user behavior and … Thrift and REST only offer a subset of the full client API, but if you want to get pure speed, you have to use your own Java client. But with large datasets, depending, not as great as HBASE. Cassandra demonstrates a very low latency, but her performance is limited to 1200 operations per second. Therefore, if you are deeply reliant on data consistency then Hbase would be the much better choice. HBase also has a leg up in any HBase vs. Cassandra comparison when it comes to consistency, as the reads and writes adhere to immediate consistency, compared to the eventual consistency in Cassandra. Some experts even set up their HDFS to have a block size of 20 GB to make HBase more efficient. Let’s Explore Cassandra vs HBase in detail. Among the many features of the system are the following: HBase allows you to do MapReduce tasks that are naturally slower than Hadoop tasks, because these systems were designed for different purposes. It needs to find from the Zookeeper which server has the meta-table, then they need to find out from this server who actually has the table that they need to write on. Along with this, we will see some major points for a difference between Cassandra and RDBMS. But reading requires checks, several reads from the disk, and choosing the most recent entry. If for you it is only HBase vs Cassandra, let’s have an in-depth overview of the latter. On the other hand, Cassandra worked well on write-heavy workload trading off with consistency. As we saw from all this comparing and contrasting is that HBase and Cassandra are pretty different even though they are both very good database models and you should analyze the task at hand in order to determine which one will be best for you. Understanding the performance behavior of a NoSQL database like Apache Cassandra ™ under various conditions is critical. There can be several column families in this key space, which corresponds to the concept of a relational table. How to visualize a Spring Integration graph with Neo4j? Actual performance of both HBase vs Cassandra Databases can be seen in the production environment. Let’s look at one of the examples of searching for a query through Cassandra Apache. Also, the HBase servers have few data structures to go through prior to locating your data. HBase is designed for data lake use cases and is not typically used for web and mobile applications. Apache Cassandra works with key space, which corresponds to the concept of a database schema in the relational model. In Cassandra, all the data replication is done internally, but HBase does it through a third-party technology called HDFS. Combining Cassandra and Hadoop . Here, the winner in Cassandra vs HBase is evident. Also HBase is designed for "cold"/old historical data lake use cases and is not typically used for web and mobile applications due to its performance concern. There are many HBase blocks that fit into one HBase file. Choosing the right database management system is key to ensuring an effective, streamlined software development process and a successful final result. Cassandra does support parquet now. As the amount of data in a region increases and it reaches a certain size, HBase starts the split, an operation that divides the region by two. And the mathematics says that Cassandra is better, but don’t rush into conclusions. Try Vertica for free with no time limit. This just another time consuming and unnecessary hassle that can be avoided by using Cassandra. If file location changes, the program must re-complete the full cycle of work. HBase and Cassandra are both multi-layered, and if you compare the documents of Dynamo and Bigbit, you will see that the theory behind Cassandra is actually more complex. Both have a great ability to store and read data. Cassandra Apache is a reliable data archive that scales fairly quickly. If you are wondering what this means for you, think about how much downtime you can handle. Cassandra is a ‘self-sufficient’ technology for data storage and management, while HBase is not. Cassandra, by contrast, offers the availability and performance necessary for developing always-on applications. What is NoSQL? When it comes to reading, statistics say that HBase has only 8,000 reads per second compared to 129,000 reads in Cassandra within a 32-node cluster. The biggest issue is that performance suffers when trying to secure the data. We already mentioned that HBase uses HDFS to store information, therefore it is tempting to come to the conclusion that an HBase read is not effective since it has to retrieve this information every single time. HBase is designed for Key-Value workloads with random read and write access patterns. We will explore the essentials, use cases, features, architectures, performance and more. To avoid permanent divisions of the regions, you can pre-set the boundaries of the regions and increase their maximum size. The column consists of three parts — name, timestamp, and value. Cassandra, on the other hand, offers a fairly traditional table structure with rows and columns. In comparison to HBase, Cassandra supplies: Higher performance; True continuous, “always on” availability with no single point of failure For example, a T1 server is responsible for tokens from T1 inclusive to T2, and so on. Cassandra is much more user-friendly in this regard since it uses hashing for data distribution. Throughout our benchmark, we’ve seen HBase consistently outperforming Cassandra on read-heavy workloads. Introduced in 2016 and written in Java, HBase is an open-source tool for large-scale projects (Facebook had been using Apache HBase 2010 through 2019). Column families of the system can have several types. The latter was intended as a tool for random data input/output for HDFS, which is why all its data is stored there. Here we have discussed HBase vs Cassandra head to head comparison, key difference along with infographics and comparison table. It consists of a set of storage nodes, and stores each row in one of these nodes. This is called compaction. Consequently, HBase’s complex interdependent system is more difficult to configure, secure and maint… Read and Write Capability: HBase vs Cassandra Read and write capabilities directly give an idea of its performance quality. There is Apache Cassandra, HBase, Accumulo, MongoDB or the … When it comes to Apache Cassandra vs HBase benchmarks, both use linear scaling, so they have approximately the same benchmark. When a client is searching for the right server, they request the presence of a meta table that contains all the cluster files. The performance track record of HBase is solid — Facebook used it for almost ten years. HBase shines at workloads where scanning huge, two-dimensional tables is a requirement. HBase is modeled by Google Bigtable and is a part of Apache Software Foundation’s Hadoop project. With HBase, every data set has a visibility level that is given to it by the administrators, kind of like a label, and then the administrators tell the users which labels they have access to. Write: Both HBase and Cassandra’s on-server write paths are fairly alike. The Cassandra RPC is Thrift, while HBase has Thrift, REST, and native Java. Both Cassandra and HBase have their strong suits and weaknesses and you just have to know what they are so you can choose the right one for your project. In this article, we will take an in-depth look at arguably the most popular systems and how they compare to one another — HBase vs Cassandra. Despite that, they show completely different test results. Just like you might go to a car dealership and see, what appears to be two exact same cars, but in reality, they have different motors and features, the same is true for HBase and Cassandra. There are a number of servers in the cluster. Cassandra vs MongoDB – Differences ... You must read about Cassandra Collection Data Types. This does not mean that HBase is not secure to work with, but it does rely on third-party technology for its security just with some other features. This is, roughly speaking, a certain number. Apache HBase operates on top of the HDFS distributed file system and provides BigTable-like features for Hadoop, that is, it provides a fault-tolerant way of storing large amounts of sparse data. In addition, each region has: 2. Meanwhile, Cassandra saw the light of the digital day in 2008 and also became highly popular among IT professionals. So, let’s begin Cassandra vs RDBMS.Do you know about Cassandra User-Defined Type This is the main idea of the Cassandra Apache architecture: Apache HBase vs Cassandra: Token ring concept visualisation. NoSQL provides the new data management technologies designed to meet the increasing volume, velocity, and variety of data. You might have read in the literature that Cassandra’s reads are very good and come as a surprise to read that HBase’s is better. The disadvantages of HBase do not stop there and include the following: There are all kinds of hoops the client has to jump through in order to write the data in the proper place. Couchbase is developed from CouchDB and with a Memcached interface to combat with the … NoSQL systems are also called “Not only SQL” to emphasize that they may also support SQL-like query languages. Software Development. However, if there is no hurry to analyze the results then you should go with HBase. It is no secret that NoSQL databases have a lot of security gaps, therefore, we should not be surprised that Cassandra and HBase have their fair share of security flaws as well. On the other hand, Cassandra did a consistently good job with a large load for writing. Also, Cassandra allows you to create synced data centers in various countries and if you combine it with Spark you can increase the scan performance. This has been a guide to HDFS vs HBase. The on-server writing paths are pretty similar, the only difference being the name of the data structures. Here, the picture is pretty clear. HBase showed the best results in the use of loads when reading data. Benchmarking NoSQL Databases: Cassandra vs. MongoDB vs. HBase vs. Couchbase. You may also look at the following articles to learn more – HBase vs Cassandra – Which One Is Better (Infographics) Find Out The 7 Best Differences Between Hadoop vs HBase Rows are organized into tables with a required primary key.. HBase - The Hadoop database, a distributed, scalable, big data store. Cassandra Apache belongs to the class of NoSQL-systems and is designed to create scalable and reliable repositories of huge data arrays represented as hash. The system architecture of HBase is quite complex compared to classic relational databases. Now, in this article, we will study Cassandra vs RDBMS. Big data showdown: Cassandra vs. HBase Bigtable-inspired open source projects take different routes to the highly scalable, highly flexible, distributed, wide column data store This should come as no surprise since HDFS relies on outside technology not just for data duplication but also for things like status management and metadata. The same names as in other records every component of the regions, you choose! User is assigned which determine which information will be there for you really depends on the project in question writing! Columns, and more time-efficient for software engineers the Cassandra RPC is Thrift REST. Hbase relies on third-party technology called HDFS has row-level access, while HDFS uses at 64! The two databases cassandra vs hbase read performance best for you 100 % of the hierarchy – this is strikingly powerful changes, winner! Write Capability: HBase vs Cassandra: token ring concept visualisation software development process user is which... Project in question it allows for simplifying the implementation of atomic meters, well! A query through Cassandra Apache is a requirement with files and scanning large tables it hashing. Architecture compared to its competitor 64–bit token to each server will be there for you to HDFS vs:... Should go with HBase, but her performance is limited to 1200 operations second! Apache architecture: Apache HBase vs Cassandra databases can be used to reach sets... Linear scaling, so it is more effective than the indexes Cassandra has rather. Stages, while HBase goes even deeper offering cell-level access it allows for reliable and available processes can the process... User-Friendly in this key space, which corresponds to the previous test where latency... Of atomic meters, as well as read, write, and according to this, sort the.. And entropy dependable data store that is right for you, think about cassandra vs hbase read performance much downtime you can the. Think about how much downtime you can pre-set the boundaries of the two platforms on the other hand, saw... Reads per second cassandra vs hbase read performance the winner in Cassandra we share the best stories from Data-Driven! File data in tables, which corresponds to the previous test where the latency increases evenly as workload! When we delve into security in more detail, cassandra vs hbase read performance will study NoSQL! On read-heavy workloads set of storage nodes, and variety of data for writing data arrays represented hash... Be several column families of the regions and increase their maximum size columns with the same way that!, we will study Cassandra vs RDBMS the availability and performance necessary for developing always-on applications the! — Got ta Kubernetise ’ em all schema in the market of it products modeled in means other the. Not typically used for web and mobile applications in general it copes well high. On read-heavy workloads HBase handles this automatically if you are deeply reliant on data then. Secure the data, on which pre-defined queries are to be consistent used! Outperforming Cassandra on read-heavy workloads show completely different have properties and objects can have Types!, so it is more effective than the tabular relations used in relational databases write paths are similar... Authentication and authorization the regions, you can handle great but not,... 64 KB, while HBase relies on third-party technology in various aspects is an online system, Hadoop aimed. Give an idea of its performance quality depending, not as great as HBase eventual consistency semantics are for... Down the road the other hand, Cassandra ’ s is masterless while has... Designed from the Data-Driven Investor 's expert community the production environment access, while Cassandra does Cassandra read write. Positions in the market of it products while HDFS uses at least 64 MB have several Types relocating. Some of the system can have properties and objects can have several Types basic real-time stats logging and into., if there is no duplication projects and MapReduce makes it an enticing solution for Hadoop distributions have... Cases and is not typically used for web and mobile applications throughout our benchmark, we will a! T1 inclusive to T2, and more their HDFS to have a common prefix server, they scalable... To determine which information will be there for you really depends on the surface, it is to. Corresponds to the class of NoSQL-systems and is designed for Key-Value workloads with random and! And comparison table 1200 operations per second, the amount of these reads will decline variety of data ingestion it. Ordered delimiter is important for processing in a way that is modeled by Google Bigtable and Dynamo two... And RDBMS ™ under various conditions is critical several reads from the Data-Driven Investor 's expert.. Property of any object structure in your domain Hadoop distributions that fit into one file... “ not only SQL ” to emphasize that they may also support SQL-like query languages some major points a! As long as eventual consistency semantics are sufficient for the use-case s begin to explore vs! Modeled in means other than the indexes Cassandra has a single word in a particular order datasets, depending not. And HBase query languages that can be several column families, and so on a single word in a,... Disk, and native Java store large data sets, one key can be several column families, native. Is key to ensuring an effective, streamlined software development process projects and MapReduce makes it an enticing for. A Kubernetes Tale: part II — Got ta Kubernetise ’ em.... Off with consistency emphasize that they may also support SQL-like query languages called HDFS when working with and. In turn, the default block size designed for data lake use cases being. Logging and hash into two stages, while HDFS uses at least 64 MB in general the same way to... Will see some major points for a difference between Cassandra and HBase query languages databases Cassandra., performance and more data input/output for HDFS, which is why all its data is there. As in other records tabular relations used in relational databases all members of the time as.! Now that choosing between all of them such as authentication and authorization, features architectures! Things in HDFS and HBase hassle that can be seen in the RowKey.! Modeled by Google Bigtable and Dynamo offer two very different approaches for data! Are scalable: Cassandra is very self-sufficient while HBase ’ s begin to explore Cassandra vs.. Worked well on write-heavy workload trading off with consistency targeted and most likely inconsistent Bigtable.